Donor-Advised Fund vs. Private Foundation: An Educational Guide for High-Net-Worth Donors

Understanding Two Common Philanthropic Structures

High-net-worth individuals and families who wish to formalize charitable giving often consider two primary vehicles: donor-advised funds (DAFs) and private foundations. While both structures support long-term philanthropy, they differ significantly in governance, administrative responsibility, tax treatment, and flexibility.

This guide provides a high-level educational comparison to help frame discussions around charitable planning. The appropriateness of either structure depends on individual goals, resources, and professional guidance.

What is a Donor Advised Fund (DAF)?

A donor-advised fund is a charitable account established with a sponsoring public charity. Once assets are contributed, the donor may recommend grants to qualified charitable organizations over time, subject to the sponsor’s approval.

Key Characteristics of a DAF

• Simplified setup and administration

• Oversight handled by the sponsoring organization

• Ability to contribute cash or certain appreciated assets

• Flexibility in timing charitable grants

• Potential for higher charitable deduction limits compared to private foundations

DAFs are often used by donors seeking administrative efficiency and long-term giving flexibility.

What is a Private Foundation?

A private foundation is an independent charitable entity created and governed by the donor or family. It operates as its own legal organization and must comply with specific IRS rules governing charitable activity.

Key Characteristics of a Private Foundation

• Direct control over governance, investments, and grantmaking

• Ability to involve family members in leadership roles

• Broader range of potential charitable activities

• Ongoing legal, tax, and administrative responsibilities

• Required public disclosure of financial activity

Private foundations may appeal to donors seeking a hands-on philanthropic role and long-term family engagement.

Comparing Administrative Responsibilities

Administrative complexity is one of the most significant differences between these two structures.

Donor-Advised Funds

• Administrative duties handled by the sponsoring charity

• Annual reporting, grant vetting, and compliance managed externally

• Fees typically based on a percentage of assets

Private Foundations

• Responsibility for annual tax filings and regulatory compliance

• Requirement to manage accounting, governance, and grant administration

• Often involve legal, accounting, and investment advisory support

The time and cost commitment can differ substantially between the two approaches.

Tax Considerations

Tax treatment varies depending on the charitable vehicle and type of contribution.

General Differences

• DAFs: Often allow higher annual deduction limits relative to adjusted gross income

• Private Foundations: Typically subject to lower deduction limits and additional regulatory requirements

• Excise Taxes: Private foundations may be subject to an excise tax on net investment income

Tax outcomes depend on asset type, income level, and timing, making professional coordination essential.

Control and Investment Oversight

Control over charitable assets is another distinguishing factor.

DAF Structure

Donors provide grant recommendations and select from available investment options, but the sponsoring organization retains final authority.

Private Foundation Structure

Foundations offer full control over investment strategy and grantmaking decisions, subject to IRS rules and fiduciary responsibilities.

The desired level of involvement often influences this choice.

Privacy and Public Disclosure

Privacy considerations may be important for some donors.

• DAFs: Grants can often be made anonymously, as the sponsoring charity is the public donor

• Private Foundations: Financial filings and grant recipients are public record

These differences may affect how donors prefer to structure their giving.

Grantmaking Flexibility

Private foundations may support certain activities that DAFs generally cannot, such as funding scholarships directly to individuals or supporting specific international initiatives, provided IRS requirements are met.

DAFs are typically limited to making grants to qualified public charities, which simplifies compliance but narrows scope.

Choosing Between a DAF and a Private Foundation

The decision often depends on balancing control, complexity, and long-term objectives.

Common Considerations

• Desired level of administrative involvement

• Family governance and succession planning goals

• Privacy preferences

• Size and complexity of charitable assets

• Long-term philanthropic vision

Evaluating these factors within a broader financial and estate plan can help clarify the appropriate structure.

Conclusion

Donor-advised funds and private foundations are both established tools for structured charitable giving. Each offers distinct advantages and responsibilities. Understanding how these vehicles differ can support informed discussions about aligning philanthropy with long-term financial, tax, and legacy goals.

---

Investment advice offered through Stratos Wealth Partners, Ltd., a registered investment advisor. Stratos Wealth Partners, Ltd and Parkview Partners Capital Management are separate entities. Neither Stratos nor Parkview Partners Capital Management provides legal or tax advice. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. The information presented is for educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as individualized investment, tax, or legal advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. For more information, please review our Form ADV, available upon request.